Dating a female narcissist and aging

dating a female narcissist and aging

Only a small fraction of the women I have dated have acted-out consistently on the narcissistic spectrum. I have combined the experiences with. But when the narcissist gets comfortable in the relationship again, (s)he'll go back But the client whose husband moved his pregnant girlfriend into the spare Caretaking men seem less likely to leave than women, perhaps because of Illnesses, aging, and job losses or promotions can act as triggers for the narcissist to. Keywords: aging, case study, narcissism, personality disorder . of older adult women in our larger study, has little interest in sexual activities. NAS said that dating had been “a game” for her, but the men she dated did not see it that way.

Dating a female narcissist and aging - In a Relationship with a Narcissist? What You Need to Know About Narcissistic Relationships

NAS's informants confirmed her descriptions of her narcissistic characteristics, and they also provided additional and sometimes less tactful confirmation of the ways in which she had alienated other people over the years.

In a retrospective account of her personality ages 30 to 35 , NAS met six NPD criteria at a clinically significant level. She met all but one feelings of envy and jealousy or being the target thereof of her presently-reported NPD criteria and met two additional criteria that were present in the past but were no longer characteristic of her: NAS did not endorse any subjective distress or impairment resulting from NPD symptoms at this earlier point in her life, but additional information described subsequently did indicate marked interpersonal problems.

Hence, we also feel confident about a past diagnosis of NPD. Once again, this endorsement probably reflected the consequences of her inability to maintain significant interpersonal relationships as a result of her narcissism; it did not reflect a schizoid-like insular style.

She met the same three histrionic PD criteria noted in the previous section. Both of these characteristics were related to her love life and her relationships with men. She admitted to leading men on while using them for their money. She claimed that several men left her house in tears after she rejected their marriage proposals; presumably, they viewed their relationship much differently than she did. As a basis of comparison, one study found that 1, subjects men, women, ages 17 to 49 endorsed a mean of A different sample, one of elite college students, had a mean of NAS's responses indicate that she is roughly 1.

A selection of some of her responses on the NPI include the following endorsements: Among the seven items that were inconsistent between her two accounts, NAS endorsed the more narcissistic response six times and the less narcissistic response one time.

Two of the responses that NAS selected to be more descriptive of her previous self than present self were: The first item looks to the future, which is a perspective younger adults may take more often than older adults who spend more time reflecting ; the second item does not specify whether one should exclude physical limitations of which older adults frequently have many.

NAS's failure to endorse items such as these in the present may reflect context-specific aspects of normal aging, not because of real changes in her personality. As high scores indicate higher levels of explicit self-esteem, a score of 30 indicated that NAS could not have a more positive self-concept, at least as measured by the RSES.

NAS's retrospective profile also showed numerous personality extremes. NAS's general personality at the factor-level remained relatively stable between her present and retrospective reports; her score levels e. NAS also reported experiencing some difficult events e. Her very low score indicated essentially no self-reported depression. Given that NAS is in her mid 80s, she may have endorsed these items because of physiological rather than psychological disturbances.

In fact, NAS explicitly stated that two of these symptoms were due to medical conditions. For reasons such as this, Morin et al. We must note, however, that her lack of self-reported symptomatology could also have been due to a defensive denial resulting from her narcissistic need to maintain a positive self-concept.

Social Structure and Supplemental Information Social convoys: Time 1 Compared to the other individuals participating in our larger study of older adults, NAS reported a somewhat large social network N The four people in her innermost social circle—individuals that she could not live without—were her brother, her daughter, and two friends she had known one for three years and the other for Each of the three people in her next social level—individuals to whom she felt very close—were friends she had known for two, 10, and 25 years.

She identified four people in her outermost social level—individuals she thought needed to be included to give an accurate depiction of her social network. Of the four people in her innermost circle, now all were family members. Two of these individuals were the family members reported at Time 1 brother and daughter but two were new additions a niece and a nephew. The two individuals from Time 1 not included in her Time 2 innermost social circle who were previously included as friends she could not live without had been demoted to her middle circle, which now contained six people.

Only one member appeared in her middle circle on both Times 1 and 2. Of the three remaining middle circle members, one was a friend who had been promoted from her Time 1 outer circle and two were friends who were not identified at Time 1. NAS identified five individuals all friends in her outer circle, none of whom appeared anywhere in her Time 1 circle.

Stability and change Many notable changes occurred in NAS's social networks. In short, NAS consistently placed only three of the 20 individuals across administrations. We interpret these results to suggest that NAS's social network is very unstable, even across the relatively short, two month time period.

Supplemental information Data from her clinical interviews and journal entries revealed additional aspects of her personality, interpersonal relationships, and thought processes. At a time in life when many other women would focus on aspects of their lives such as their children i. Like the instability of her present social network, NAS's journal entries revealed a constantly rotating cast of individuals, most of whom were men.

Dating 3 to 5 men at once was not uncommon for her during this period. And although some men appeared in entries spanning a few months, the majority of her romantic relationships seemed to have been somewhat superficial and largely transient.

As part of her intake, we also asked NAS to list the major milestones and accomplishments in her life beginning with her youth. Both the information she did and did not report was interesting. She seemed to have been most concerned with maintaining a positive image of herself, and thus may have tended to omit or minimize events that contradicted or failed to confirm her grandiose self-perceptions. She did abuse alcohol; otherwise, however, there was little self-report data that suggested NAS was impaired by her narcissism.

If asked, NAS would likely say that she has a wonderful life. But when looking beyond her self-reports and combining information gathered from multiple sources, evidence of past and present dysfunction and impairment emerged. NAS evidenced a lifelong history of significant impairments in her self-other representations and interpersonal functioning two of the four areas which PDs often affect; see APA, , p. These two areas were intimately related; in fact, there was probably a causal relationship between the two, with her skewed self-other representations impairing her ability to develop and maintain close relationships.

NAS's self-focus, sense of entitlement, lack of empathy, and inability to perceive another person's point of view probably made it difficult for others to connect with her. This question shows the extent of NAS's narcissistic perceptions. Not only did she identify herself as the possible reason for a major global conflict grandiosity , but, in so doing, she also disregarded the victims of this tragic occurrence lack of empathy. Even during our relatively short interviews, NAS's overwhelmingly overt narcissism made it difficult to develop a mutual rapport—a crucial building block for the beginning of any interpersonal relationship.

From her journal entries, we gathered that many of NAS's previous relationships were transient and superficial which is consistent with the results of her present Social Convoys. This quote from her journal exemplifies the nature of her interpersonal relationships all names and locations changed to protect confidentiality: Peter is still around, but I know I couldn't get along with him.

Ray said the other night that we should pack up his trailer and head for South Carolina. I think I could get along with him, but I really don't care for him. Jacob wants me to make my mind up by Valentine's Day. With him I would certainly have security, plus everything my little heart desires.

Jim said I could go to Oregon with him. I told him I haven't tired of him yet. On the other hand, I haven't seen as much of him as the others yet. The contents of this quotation illustrate NAS's self-focus and exploitative nature.

Her focus is not on these men as individuals, but rather on herself and their desire to have a relationship with her. NAS enjoyed their admiration, seemed to revel in the control that she had over them, and was not at all concerned with how her behavior may have affected them.

With the possible exceptions of the relationships with her daughter and brother, none of her past or present relationships seemed to be meaningful at all. From our data, which we gathered using many methods, instruments, and informants, we feel confident concluding that NAS has experienced serious, lifelong interpersonal impairment as a result of her pathological narcissism. NAS's dysfunction across her lifespan can be understood through a developmental theory of personality e.

Beginning in her adolescence and perhaps earlier , NAS failed to proceed through pivotal life stages as evidenced by her inability to develop a stable, non-contingent identity; engage in mutually beneficial intimate relationships; meaningfully engage her role as a parent; and cultivate a personal integrity. Her narcissistic tendencies seemed to have hindered her ability to navigate these challenges effectively. Now as an older adult, NAS's life is largely empty, without many any?

However, these perceptions are not fully based in reality, as NAS has had no significant, long-lasting, meaningful relationships; has made no significant contributions beyond those typically made by other people, and has continuously created havoc for those who have entered her life.

Hence, even if personality and personality pathology soften with age, PDs can persist into, and be associated with marked impairment, in later life. Therefore, as previous literature suggests, the current criteria may not adequately capture the manifestations of NPD well in later life.

Third, convergent evidence from multiple sources may be helpful when assessing PDs in older adults e. While the SIDP-IV was able to assess the diagnostic features of NPD, the supplemental information from the NPI, the RSES, clinical interviews, her Social Convoys, and her journal entries provided additional descriptive information that we used to help determine the manifestations and especially the consequences of her personality pathology.

Her grandiosity, entitlement, lack of empathy, and exploitativeness, especially, likely prevented her from maintaining social, romantic, and marital relationships and have left her relatively isolated in later life. And fifth, NAS's trait personality profile was relatively stable across her present and retrospective accounts, indicating that when personality remains stable, the NEO PI-R is able to reflect that stability, even across multiple decades.

Although there are no instruments perfectly suited to measure PDs in later life, we can offer a couple of suggestions for clinicians who wish to identify these disorders in their older clients. First, we suggest using a battery of tests instead of just one. In particular, we suggest using at least one PD measure and at least one trait measure; in our experience, trait measures are more resistant to erroneous results when used with older adults than are PD measures.

When working with measures that have known item problems, identifying items that might contain measurement bias and making a clinical judgment based on adapting the item to fit the later life context may be useful although less than ideal. Multiple informants should be used for a more thorough assessment; at least one should be used for a briefer assessment. On a related note, we also recommend focusing on dysfunction in social relationships, which is a key correlate of PDs as previously described.

And finally, it may be useful for clinicians to rely partly on their own reactions; however, clinicians would certainly want to avoid putting too much weight on personal reactions that can be idiosyncratic and misleading at times. As with all clients, and especially with older adult clients, the safest PD diagnosis can be made when information gathered from multiple sources and multiple instruments converge.

Although this case study addresses several key unresolved questions in the PD literature, it also raises as many questions as it addresses. What are the optimal criteria for capturing NPD in later life? Do we need separate diagnostic criteria for assessing NPD in older adults, or can criteria without age biases be developed?

Are there also unique treatment considerations for older adults with PDs? Do differences in present and retrospective accounts of personality reflect item bias, personality change, or inaccurate recollection?

Might the procedure we implemented of using anchor points 30 or 40 years apart be used on a wider scale e. We must leave these questions for future analysis. What is clear, however, is that NPD does exist in older adults and is associated with significant impairment. We hope that these findings will stimulate additional studies on the presentation, assessment, and consequences of NPD and other PDs in older adults.

Full terms and conditions of use: Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.

The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.

Personality disorder symptoms and functioning in elderly depressed patients. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. Personality disorders in late life: Understanding and overcoming the gap in research. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Antonucci TC, Akiyama H. Social networks in adult life and a preliminary examination of the convoy model. Social support and the maintenance of competence.

Social mechanisms for maintaining competence in old age. Springer; New York, NY: Personality change precedes clinical diagnosis of dementia of the Alzheimer type.

The Journals of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. Narcissistic relationships tend to be very challenging. They tend to only see the partner in terms of how they fill their needs or fail to fill their needs. Their mates and children are only valued in terms of their ability to meet these needs. Yet many people are drawn to narcissistic relationships.

Narcissistic partners can be very captivating, especially at the beginning. However, in time, they can be too controlling in relationships. They may feel jealous or easily hurt. When narcissistic injuries occur, they often lash out and can be cutting.

Their reactions are dramatic and attention-seeking. According to narcissistic personality expert, Dr. In general, trait narcissism is associated with behaving in such a way that one is perceived as more likable in initial encounters with strangers— but this likability diminishes with time and increased exposure to the narcissistic individual.

Narcissists are prone to falling madly in love with someone instantly and are very quick to commit. However, this initial love and commitment is not easily sustained. When you are in a narcissistic relationship, you may feel very lonely. Narcissistic partners act as if they are always right, that they know better and that their partner is wrong or incompetent. Is There a Cure For Narcissism What are some things a person can do to deal with a narcissistic partner?

Does the negative image of yourself they foster with their criticisms and superior attitudes resonate with your own critical thoughts about yourself? Understanding your role in the narcissistic relationship is important. This will, in turn, challenge your partner to change their style of relating. You can also develop your own self-confidence and self-worth by learning to practice self-compassion. In all encounters, act equal, and treat your partner as an equal.

How can people face and overcome their own narcissism? The attitudes they internalized very early on in their lives. They need to recognize and challenge these attitudes toward themselves and toward others. Another way to cure narcissism is to foster self-compassion rather than self-esteem.


  • Dedicated to your stories and ideas.
  • 3. She sabotages your friendships and relationships, stirring chaos within social groups.
  • About the Author